The LA Times’ Matea Gold has Phil Griffin spinning like a top over the Matthews/Olbermann pairing for the inauguration…
At the time, MSNBC President Phil Griffin insisted he wasn’t swayed by the critique. Nonetheless, he said he concluded that Olbermann and Matthews “were being restrained” from sharing their opinions when they served as news anchors. To allow them to converse more freely, he made Gregory the lead news anchor for major politics events for the rest of the campaign. Olbermann and Matthews remained a major part of the coverage of the presidential debates and election night but were considered analysts, not news anchors.
Now that the election is over, that distinction seems to have blurred. Gregory, the new moderator of “Meet the Press,” will be contributing to the broadcast network’s inauguration coverage, while Olbermann and Matthews will once again be leading MSNBC’s coverage.
In an interview today, Griffin said he’s comfortable with the role that Olbermann and Matthews will play at the inauguration because it’s “a whole day of color commentary.”
“This is a day of watching the festivities and the pomp and circumstance,” he said.
Griffin said he has “no problem putting our guys out to host programs on big events,” adding: “I want to highlight them.”
So Griffin is comfortable if Matthews and Olbermann should perchance cross the line again? Doesn’t he understand that it was precisely the shoot from the hip opinions of the two that caused an uproar inside NBC News? It didn’t work last year. What’s changed this time around? Eventually, if they host enough events, one or both will say something they shouldn’t and a controversy will erupt. That’s not the point of having someone host national news events, to have a controversy erupt. If the ever opinionated FNC can understand that rule, it shouldn’t be too hard for NBC to understand.