Ali Velshi interviews Tim Geithner…
Ali Velshi will be interviewing Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner during the 5pm hour of the Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer and 8pm during Campbell Brown No Bias, No Bull. Some highlights after the jump…
ON THE CONTINUING CONTROVERSY OVER THE AIG BONUSES:
VELSHI: There is some dispute as to who knew when what. AIG’s CEO said that you
might have known about this earlier than you did. When did you learn
about this and what did you learn?
GEITHNER: I was informed by my staff of the full scale of these specific
things on Tuesday, March 10th. And as soon as I heard about the full
scale of these things, we moved very actively to explore every possible
avenue — legal avenue to address this problem, to make sure that,
again, the assistance we were providing was not going to unduly benefit
these people.
And, you know, we moved very quickly. We’ve made it clear that the
payments going forward had to be renegotiated and we’re going to make
sure that the taxpayer is compensated for any payments we can’t recoup.
And we’re exploring all legal means to recoup those payments.
VELSHI: But you’re pretty certain on the advice that you’ve been given
that we can’t just legally not give these — or get any of these bonuses
back?
GEITHNER: Absolutely. That our best judgment at the time was we had no
legal ability to block a set (ph) of those payments, but those that we
had the capacity to affect, we insisted or renegotiated.
In any case, we’re going to go back and try to recoup the payments that
were already made we had no legal ability to block at that time.
VELSHI: As far as you can remember, though, you did not know about this
before March 10th?
GEITHNER: On Tuesday I was informed about the full scale and scope of
these specific bonus problems. And again, as soon as I did — but, you
know, it’s my responsibility, I was in a position where I didn’t know
about those sooner, I take full responsibility for that.
ON SENATOR DODD:
VELSHI: Let’s just talk a little moment again about those payments and
the legal ramifications of doing anything about it. Senator Dodd says
that he had a clause that was put into the stimulus bill that basically
allowed these payments to be made to people at AIG in this particular
unit and he says that somebody at Treasury asked him to put it in.
GEITHNER: Let me just start by saying that Chairman Dodd has played an
enormously important leadership role in this and he’s doing the right
thing in trying to make sure that the assistance we provide don’t go to
benefit people that shouldn’t benefit from these things. And I am
enormously impressed by the importance of what he’s trying to do in this
case.
VELSHI: But somebody – have we figured out who told him to put this
clause in?
GEITHNER: This provision? We expressed concern about this specific
version. We wanted to make sure it was strong enough to survive legal
challenge. But we also worked with him to strengthen the overall
framework and his bill has this very important provision we’re relying
on now to go back and see if we can recoup payments that were made that
there was no legal ability to block.
VELSHI: But inadvertently might somebody at Treasury have told Senator
Dodd to do something that has now resulted in these payments not being
able to …
GEITHNER: No, again, what we did is just express concern about the
vulnerability of a specific part of this provision, the legal challenge,
as you would expect us to do, that’s part of the legislative process,
but again, his bill also has this very important provision that allows
us to go back and see if we can recoup these payments and we’re going to
explore that, but in any case we’re going to make sure that the American
people are compensated for any payments we can recoup.
VELSHI: Do we know who in Treasury had this conversation with whomever
on the banking committee?
GEITHNER: Treasury staff were working Senator Dodd’s staff throughout
this process. Again, that’s part of the legislative process.
VELSHI: But you weren’t involved in that directly?
GEITHNER: I did have with other officials some conversations with
Chairman Dodd as he was going through this process but other provisions.
VELSHI: So not about this particular one. It wasn’t you telling …
GEITHNER: No, but I’m not sure that’s relevant because Treasury staff
did express concern about whether this provision was vulnerable to legal
challenge.
ON THE RECOVERY AND THE PLAN FOR THE BANKING INDUSTRY:
GEITHNER: We’ve already started to make sure that the banks have access
to the kind of capital they need to provide lending in a recession and
we’re going – you’ll see us move very quickly in the next few weeks to
lay out a plan to help deal with these real estate related assets that
are at the core of the financial system.
VELSHI: How much money do you think that’s going to take?
GEITHNER: You know, it’s …
VELSHI: The number 2 trillion is kind of out there.
GEITHNER: I wouldn’t look at those numbers. Again, the important thing
is the Congress has given us a substantial amount of resources and we’re
going to direct that where it’s going to be most effective in getting
credit flowing again. And you’re going to see us again continue to move
very, very quickly. This government has done more in weeks than you see
most governments do in months and years and that’s because of the depth
and severity of the problems we inherited and because, again, our
judgment is the quicker we move, the more aggressive we are, the quicker
we’re going to bring recovery back on track?
VELSHI: And when do you think we’ll start to see recovery?
March 19, 2009 at 2:41 pm
Can these people possibly be more incompetent? Our economy is sinking, so Obama hires a tax cheat to get us out of it.
The Dems in Congress & the White House express this phony outrage over the AIG bonuses…..except, THEY’RE THE ONES THAT PUT THEM IN. Dodd lied about it and so did Geithner. Dodd fessed up to his line yesterday, and quickly used Geithner as a scapegoat.
So, they both lied to us, and are trying stoke public outrage over a problem they created!! Ridiculous.
March 19, 2009 at 2:45 pm
Geithner needs to go. Come on Barack, we like that you’re not afraid to admit you were wrong. Get it over with.
March 19, 2009 at 6:20 pm
I was opposed to Mr. Geithner getting the Treas Sec job because he was a major player working out the details of the original bail-out last Fall, and his tax trouble excuse was lame.
On the matter of these AIG bonuses, I have a different take on it concerning the Secretary. Considering what he or anyone else in that job deals with, I sort of doubt he’d spend too much thought on the myriad of minutia like these bonuses. Even if he did know about them, he’d also know that Congress was going to consider whether or not to ban the use of federal monies for such… he can set up deals but he can’t make laws. He’s being made the scapegoat.
Mr. Geithner does not appear to know what he is doing regarding the mortgage mess. His inactions on the economy front appear at odds with the FED, making runaway inflation in the near future an increasing possibility. On the other hand, he doesn’t yet have any deputies. Those who have been put up pulled out over tax issues and others have withdrawn their names from consideration, possibly because they’ve seen too many public servants have their names smeared in recent years.
I blame the Congress and the President for the way they’ve rammed unread legislation through.