The New York Times’ Clark Hoyt responds (and then some) to charges leveled by Bill O’Reilly regarding the Times coverage (or lack thereof in O’Reilly’s opinion) of “ties” between Acorn and the Obama campaign…
O’Reilly picked up the allegation two weeks later. During his April 1 broadcast, he said The Times had been investigating links between Acorn and the Obama campaign, then played this excerpt of a voicemail: “Hi, Anita. It’s Stephanie. I have just been asked by my bosses to stand down. They want me to hold off on coming to Washington. Sorry, I take my orders from higher up – ah, sometimes. Anyway, um, I’m sorry about this and we’ll still be in touch. Take care. And let me know if there is anything I can do to help you. Take care. Bye-bye.”
In the context of an accusation that The Times was killing the story, presumably because it would hurt Obama, this message fit perfectly. And O’Reilly said immediately after playing the tape, “Now, if The Times killed that investigation, it’s a violation of every journalistic ethic and may have even influenced the election.”
But O’Reilly had cut from Strom’s message her reason for canceling her trip to Washington to meet with Moncrief about the Obama campaign, Acorn and an Acorn affiliate called Project Vote. Right after “stand down,” Strom had said, “ We’re running a story tonight for tomorrow that, ah, pretty well lays out the partisanship problems that Project Vote may have, ah, based on a report that I got. So, ah, they think that going to do – that’s going to be the story about the partisanship issue, and so they want me to hold off on coming to Washington.”
Putting those words back in paints quite a different picture. David Tabacoff, senior executive producer for The O’Reilly Factor, told me in e-mail that the phone call “was simply edited for time.” That would be like saving space by boiling Dick Cheney’s recent speech on national security to a single quote: “President Obama makes wise decisions.” Cheney actually did say that, but tearing it from the rest of what he said would completely distort his meaning.