The Hazards of Live TV: #25,021

Well at least the censor worked

12 Responses to “The Hazards of Live TV: #25,021”

  1. Why do they put this pompous a** on television? The last time I saw him, he was babbling about his willingness to date Sarah Palin. Whatever..

  2. Ooh, he doesn’t like Rush. Rush sells hate. Love me some original thoughts.

    Today interview.
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/33285214#33285214

  3. zonedaiatlas Says:

    Those comments that the liberal journalists claim have been said by Rush Limbaugh were proven to be fake. Michael Wilbon of ESPN issued an apology and a retraction to Rush Limbaugh yesterday after learning the so called comments were fake, Rush Limbaugh never said them.

  4. zonedaiatlas Says:

    So will we get an apology and retraction from Rick Sanchez, David Shuster and others for the slander?

  5. Rush Limbaugh simply loves to push their buttons.

    He’s the B.F. Skinner of talk radio.

  6. If Rush is Pavlov, what does that make them?

  7. …Or us, for that matter.

  8. zonedaiatlas Says:

    Rush Limbaugh is threatening legal action to people like Rick Sanchez, David Shusters and others to a retraction and apology for the smear…

    http://www.breitbart.tv/limbaugh-threatens-legal-action-against-journalists-over-false-quotes/

  9. I’m suing Deutsch for gimmick infringment. And when it comes to douchebaggery, he’s among the world’s top practitioners, ranking just below some of his MSDNC cohorts.

  10. Rush Limbaugh is threatening legal action

    Legal action? If only he had a 3-hour radio show to refute the charges.

    Sarcasm aside, Limbaugh has the resources to take the allegations head on. He doesn’t need to threaten people with lawsuits.

    Besides, it’s just about impossible to prove defamation against a public figure.

  11. zonedaiatlas Says:

    Rick Sanchez read a statement from Limbaugh but refused to retract or apologizes. I hope Limbaugh takes legal action…

  12. Maybe he can’t win, but he could litigate the guy broke, if he wanted to. Or, take a wide chunk out of CNN, depending who covers the legal fees. In any case, if he does it, it’ll be more for the fun of screwing the media than some greater cause. IMO, since I haven’t heard him discuss it.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers