Free for All: 02/17/10

What’s on your mind?

11 Responses to “Free for All: 02/17/10”

  1. Without Imus, RFD-TV isn’t looking too good to Dish:

    http://www.multichannel.com/blog/The_Satellite_Dish/30849-RFD_TV_Gets_a_Stay.php

  2. Looks like MSNBC has made some changes to their graphics…market indexes have moved to the top bar, lower thirds are flipped (topic on the left, names & additional info on the right), and the ticker font appears larger.

  3. tinafromtampa Says:

    Beck’s dog barking scene on tonight’s show will be a classic. Still laughing an hour later.

  4. I’ve discovered the secret of FNC’s success. It’s the way they say “Fox News”. They all do it the same way: Fox News; barked out like a drill sargent. It’s got a killer punch. Try that with MSNBC. Just not the same..

  5. What’s the point of an “All Star Panel” on Special Report consisting of 3 conservatives taking turns bashing the President’s policies? If there’s no opposing view, why not use one person giving a commentary?

  6. Usually it’s Steve Hayes, Krauthammer, and a liberal voice, which is better balance than when Mort is there. Mort’s not a conservative; he’s liberal on some issues and I think a genuine centrist (there aren’t many left!). When Mort’s on the panel I agree replacing say Hayes with Mara or Juan would make for better balance.

  7. They need to at least make a token effort at balance. Whether FNC likes it or not, they’re part of the mainstream now, and non-conservatives watch. Especially when hockey is on MSNBC..

  8. Dr. BW enjoys it the most when Hayes in on, because she secretly (well, not so secret any more) has a crush on him.

  9. He does work that goatee, doesn’t he?

  10. Great explanation by George Will of the Palin phenomenon and the press:

    Today’s saturation journalism, mesmerized by presidential politics and ravenous for material, requires a steady stream of political novelties. In that role, Palin is united with the media in a relationship of mutual loathing. This is not her fault. But neither is it her validation.”

    Will states in three of four sentences what would take me 1,000 words. And I’d still muddle it up.

    Marvelous.

  11. You’re right, Steve. That was brilliant.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers