Too Much BP Coverage?
Andrew Tyndall bravely treads out on dangerous ground and writes that coverage of the BP disaster has gone too far…
There comes a point where the local effects of the oil disaster become just that, a local news story, no longer of pressing concern to the national nightly newscasts. Why should the unemployment of a Louisiana oysterpacker be any more newsworthy, from a national perspective, than a laid-off California teacher or a long-term unemployed Michigan autoworker? Why should the empty beachfront bars of Pensacola attract more national attention than the casino recession on the Las Vegas Strip?
Granted, the damage to the marine ecosystem is a continuing and serious story of national importance–and sometimes when a New York based anchor travels down to the Gulf Coast an environmental lesson, for example by NBC’s Brian Williams, is what we get. Mostly, latterly, the coverage has been about the human toll of this disaster: NBC’s Williams on a shrimping family, CBS’ Katie Couric on forlorn youth, ABC’s Diane Sawyer on hymnsinging villagers. Frankly, in the national scheme of things, the dislocation in these sparsely populated coastal counties and parishes does not deserve such incessant attention–especially since BP has set aside $20bn to make them whole; especially since the disaster that befell next-door New Orleans was so much more calamitous.
The networks’ assignment desks seemed trapped by their own past enthusiasm. Having committed maximum resources to covering the story when it was at crisis stage, regaining a sense of proportion now might seem like callous indifference. It is as if a fear of seeming fickle has clouded their news judgment. NBC has been the worst offender at overstaying its welcome: in the last three weeks since the crisis broke its fever pitch, NBC has sent almost as much time (101 min v ABC 51, CBS 77) on the oil story as its two rivals put together.
It reminds me of the spring of 2000, when a minor foreign policy story, with an interesting human interest angle, became a cause celebre because the national news media, having committed to its importance, could not let go until they had found resolution. The child custody case of Elian Gonzalez ended up logging an astonishing 503 minutes of coverage, the single biggest non-campaign story of that election year. I suppose we can expect to sit through a similar daily drumbeat of oil leak coverage all through the summer until that hole is finally plugged.
Advertisement
July 13, 2010 at 5:16 pm
I disagree. The unprecendented nature of the “continuous-ness” of the event qualifies it for continued coverage. It’s not “an oil leak”, it’s “oil leaking”, a problem I didn’t even know was possible. In spite of what I’ve been hearing the last couple days, the video on my TV tells me it’s still leaking…and still should be covered.
July 13, 2010 at 5:38 pm
News coverage isn’t the problem. It makes for a great debate…everybody blames everybody. what else is going on? that’s right somewhere out there there is news happening that isn’t getting reported because they are all concerned about this one story. cover the news…not just one story that’s making news!
July 13, 2010 at 6:05 pm
The Gulf oil spout isn’t the only story being covered. In fact, the news networks have reduced coverage to make room for other stories as warranted.
The empty casinos will fill again once the economy returns, assuming it ever does. The way of life near the mouth of the Mississippi won’t return for a decade or two.
July 13, 2010 at 6:29 pm
This isn’t a ‘human-interest-story-dujour’. This is catastrophic. This is the destruction of a coast and the lifestyle that goes with it. Mentioning it in the same breath with Elian Gonzales, and similar stories, is insulting. Maybe it it was the California coast he’d see it differently.
July 13, 2010 at 7:19 pm
I understand completely where Tyndall is coming from and it isn’t that the story is being over covered.
The real problem the story has with both viewers and TV networks is lack of interesting video to illustrate the disaster. This has been the real genius of the BP spin machine. They have been able to control the coverage; with the aid of the administration, by delaying and stopping any compelling video from being shown.
The thing that made Katrina a compelling story was hour after hour of heartrending video from dozens of sources to illustrate the many amazing stories being told.
With the BP oil spill all we have seen are a static shots of oil spewing into the ocean, shots of tar balls on a beach or oil in marshes or people in tyvek clothes cleaning up the tar balls, shots of a few birds or mammals being cleaned, aerial shots of skimmers cleaning the surface oil but mostly talking heads telling you what you cannot see.
There are no shots from the ships trying to stop the leak or drill the relief wells, no shots of how and why the various plugs & caps are designed or constructed, no shots from onboard working skimmer vessels or no shots of the well head that aren’t the static shot that BP releases to the media.
The release of dispersant’s has also been a great boon to BP because it has delayed and camouflaged the oil; leaving the great majority under water, not to reach shore for many months or years to come.
It has left viewers looking for something else to watch and in due time lead to TV networks to provide that alternate coverage; just as BP and the administration want.
July 13, 2010 at 7:32 pm
- No shots of… -
Sometimes that’s a good thing. Too many images can skew perception. We can see the oily muck quite clearly in our minds’ eyes, so even without the pictures the stories are being told. We know the oil has continued to spew and we know the disaster has been poorly handled.
If James Carville’s ranting “We’re dying down here!” didn’t get the administration off its butt, more pictures wouldn’t help.
Don’t know If I agree with what I just typed. Just a thought.
July 13, 2010 at 10:24 pm
I live in South Louisiana although not along the coast. There is a great deal of frustration, anger and fear going on down here. People are angry at BP for their incompetence and the poor way in which the actual spill has been handled. People are mad at the Feds for being slow to move and hindering some cleanup efforts while bureaucrats try to study the “enviromental impact” of certain tools being attempted like the sand walls.
But, what people are even madder about down here is the drilling moratorium as people cannot go back to work and the President continues to push this even after being struck down in court. There is anxiety that some of the oil companies may permantely leave taking some great paying jobs with them. It’s as if the administration is using the spill to shut down drilling everywhere and punish the oil companies. As far as the media coverage, I have mostly followed FNC and my local news and feel like they have given a pretty balanced presentation.
July 14, 2010 at 5:31 am
Ditto, JeauxJeaux. Although I don’t live there, most of my relatives live on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. One picture that would tell quite a story – but I’ve yet to see in print – is the locals, down on the beaches, trying to clean up, and the feds and BP workers “shooing” them off while they stand around and smoke cigarettes and talk. Disgusting.
The Gulf, the Coast, and the people who live there will NEVER be the same.
July 14, 2010 at 7:07 am
Andrew Tyndall -Is he serious?
This isn’t just effecting Louisiana. Tar balls have shown up in Texas and as far east as Florida.
The impact on the marine life – who knows if that’s ever going to be able to be gauged.
Tyndall doesn’t want the President’s failing popularity to keep falling.
Too bad, it goes with the territory when you are wearing the Daddy pants. If this was George W Bush or any other Republican President, he would have been crucified by the press by now.
The truth is the clean up effort has been slow and spotty. Where is FEMA? The gulf coast beaches are U.S. territory.
Tyndall is coming off as an Obama apologist or maybe BP hired him for public relations.
July 14, 2010 at 7:08 am
I have a brother in law who lives on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. He has already filed a claim with BP.
July 14, 2010 at 9:04 am
BP Oil Spill: Containment Cap to Be Tested, Environmental Devastation Spreads
Oil Will Continue to Hit Shore for Months; 464 Turtles Dead Since Start of Spill
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/bp-oil-spill-containment-cap-tested-environmental-devastation/story?id=11156564
July 19, 2010 at 8:16 pm
I’m surprised that some think there is too much coverage. This is an ongoing environmental disaster that affects not only the environment in a vast area, but the economy, health and living conditions of those in the Gulf of Mexico. Filing a claim is fine….make the big company pay for it’s mistakes. What about the after math when the money is paid out? It seems that many have lost interest and want to move on to the next exciting news event. Help out by visiting http://www.geronimo.com Vacation homes for Charity and take some action to help a non-profit organization to continue helping.