John King vs. MSNBC and FNC?

Mediaite’s Steve Krakauer writes about John King wading into the recent Obama controversy over his renewed war on FNC by indirectly taking some shots at FNC and MSNBC…

“Sometimes you feel sad to be left out of a big debate,” he said. “This is not one of those sometimes.” And then he found a way in.

King started with Pres. Obama’s comments that Fox News was a “destructive force” in America, playing some of the more anti-Obama comments from Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity. He followed that by noting Bill Burton had called MSNBC “an invaluable service” – and proceeded to play some of the most vitriolic clips from Ed Schultz and Keith Olbermann.

When King got back on camera, all he needed to say was, “got it?”

I don’t read as much into this as Krakauer does. It’s too soon to draw any conclusions about King’s show based on one segment that occurred during one show. What I will say is that those personalities who were shown in those clips are not the types who will just ignore King’s “attack”. Expect some blowback…

Advertisement

18 Responses to “John King vs. MSNBC and FNC?”

  1. I doubt there will be any blowback. If you watch the whole segment it’s a balanced and mostly accurate discussion of Obama policies and why he and his surrogates made the decision to make the statements they made.

    It’s not a critique of FNC or MSNBC shows. In fact, aside from showing the clips and the “got that” quip, there is little or no discussion of the shows, their hosts or content. It’s all about Obama’s election strategy.

    Check out the whole segment and you’ll see what I mean. Much ado about nothing.

  2. I loved it. He’s saying what many of us have been saying. When the left says something vitriolic and nasty, it’s ok because they agree with it. When the right says something disagreeable, it’s evil and must be stopped. I think that it’s as much a criticism of the President as anything else, and another example of why he lowers himself by discussing media-issues.

  3. “He’s saying what many of us have been saying. When the left says something vitriolic and nasty, it’s ok because they agree with it. When the right says something disagreeable, it’s evil and must be stopped.”

    ^Who is the “he” you refer to? JK doesn’t say that or anything like that. The only one criticizing the POTUS was Erick Erickson and even he didn’t go that far. Did you look at the video?

  4. Perhaps that was my interpretation of what JK said, and by extension, what other conservatives might think. As far as Fox responding, it seems to me that the comment was just as critical of Obama as anyone else. It had that whole ‘fair and balance’ flavor to it.

  5. ^ JK didn’t say anything but “Got it?” which was a tiny bit of snark based on the comments he had just played. After that he just asked a few questions and let the four pundits have their say.

    My POV was best expressed by Gloria Borger, yours, I assume, by Erick Erickson. John King expressed no opinion that I could see. In fact he was very careful to point out that any statement he made was a quote from someone else.

  6. – John King expressed no opinion –

    Hence my observation of ‘fair and balanced’, and the reference to my ‘interpretation‘,. An ‘interpretation’ which might be drawn by other conservatives, such as the ones on Fox. These aren’t difficult concepts.

  7. I guess I’m just stupid because I have no idea what your talking about.

    BTW: It seems to me, the segment is actually better suited to Howard Kurtz’s Sunday show than JK’s.

  8. ^ Sorry for sounding that way. It’s clear in my head, if not on the page.

  9. JK isn’t saying it, the President is. JK is reporting it. What I’m drawing from it is the fact that Obama is praising one network with one set of whacks, while criticizing a different network with another set of whacks. As I hear it, the President is the adult in the room, (or should be) so he shouldn’t be taking-sides in an argument between children.

  10. ^ I get it now but of course I don’t agree. :-) Gloria Borger expressed my opinion better than I ever could.

  11. Sigh. Of course you don’t. :roll:

  12. I need an Advil.

  13. I haven’t seen the clip, so I’ll jump on the original Obama statement. It’s one thing for Regular Joe to agree with this shrieking blowhard, and consider that one dangerous, but POTUS shouldn’t be wading into those waters. It’s beneath the office.

  14. I don’t know what Steve saw, but I saw no bashing in the clip. King was basically reporting on the story and got some clips that would back up the white house’s claims, that is all. I don’t expect any kind of blowback.

  15. ^ Steve? ;-)

  16. ^ Oops. Sorry Jacky. I thought you were talking about the commenters; forgot the original post.

  17. You think I’m confusing.. :?:

  18. Oops. I guess there was a Steve in there.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers