Kernen vs. Harwood?

From an emailer…

CNBC 1st 10 min of the 6 AM hour.

FYI, Joe Kernin really took John Harwood to school on the fallacies of the liberal campaign (non sense science) supporting global warming Harwood was upset and speechless.

I don’t suppose anyone has video?

Advertisement

9 Responses to “Kernen vs. Harwood?”

  1. But I bet it didn’t put a dent in Harwood’s hair: blow-dried Kevlar.

  2. It was a good exchange. Joe knows his science and it was obvious by what he was saying. Harwood sat there like the dolt he is and could not refute any of Joe’s statements with any facts whatsoever.

    For myself, I think that Joe & Michelle are great co-hosts together. Whoever they add has to be on there toes since Joe & Michelle are very quick with comments. They bring an energy that Becky & Andrew do not.

    And, thank goodness Carl is gone – he is a Casper Milquetoast on whatever show he is on. My goodness – he was on the Today Show over the holidays – only saw one show and that was more than enough!

  3. Things that will wipe us out long before the so-called GLOBAL WARMING:

    > asteroid
    > sun goes supernova
    > the 10% of Muslems that have bad intentions
    > obesity
    > the apes

  4. Any cable blowhard who still disregards the reality of climate change is a hazard to viewers.

  5. I think Beijing is dying proof that we are in our last days without serious intervention. Those who deny have vested interests to protect at the expense of the remaining 99%.

  6. Like China or India is going to do a damn thing regardless of what we do? I suppose Progressive scientists recommend that we should tax the USA rich (keep it coming Scrooge McDuck) to send to the developing countries to lower their carbon paw-prints (which is what I think is really behind this crapola).
    Anyway you cut it, you lose, Fell, so better hope I’m right and Fall on your sword.

  7. Big lies that bear retelling over and over and over:

    > the rich don’t pay their fair share of taxes
    > Man-made global warming will destroy humanity faster than you can say, “Tipper loves Al”.
    > All the scientists say so.
    > Obama was born in … scuse me, somebody’s at the door.

  8. Like China or India is going to do a damn thing regardless of what we do? I suppose Progressive scientists recommend that we should tax the USA rich (keep it coming Scrooge McDuck) to send to the developing countries to lower their carbon paw-prints (which is what I think is really behind this crapola).

    This is the real reason behind conservative denial about climate change. It’s not that it’s not real. It’s that they don’t consider it worth the trouble to tackle.

  9. No, though I doubt it is real, even if it were real, it would be a fool’s errand to tackle as we don’t run the world. Worth-the-trouble meet no-chance-in-hell as nobody but us and Sweden would meet commitments.Maybe France: can never tell about those guys.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers