I love the part where Tucker Carlson is right, and it’s everybody elses fault that the voters didn’t smack their heads and realize they had all been wrong about the video 5 years ago. The only part he skipped was blaming the actual voters themselves for being lazy moochers who want all the things.
Gee, you mean that “vetting” the President, with stuff we’d already heard, four years after the fact, with breathless “Oh My God, would you LOOK at this!” didn’t work? I’m verklempt.
I’ll do it!!! RT @InsideCableNews: Someone please tell FNC that being mayor of NYC on 9/11 doesn’t make one a national security wonk.
Fun today watching NEW WH Correspondent Major Garrett being interviewed on CBS THIS MORNING by OLD WH Correspondent Norah O’Donnell.
And that’s where the whole narrative of “skewed polls” came from. It was echoed a bit on Fox, but their over-all programming did show all the polls. What I think happened was that individuals within the network were influenced by the stuff coming from these other sources, thus you had Krauthammer predicting a Romney win, the night before the election.
Charles did concede on his blog that I was the better predictor. You can’t let emotion cloud your vision.
On the other hand, the IRS Poll shows 47% would like to get presents if not required to give presents.
It was 4 year experiment to prove the voters were stupid once, and better smarten up now. And the rightwing mediasphere went about getting through to these mislead knuckleheads by overhyping pointless “scandals”, then BSing about “skewed polls” and a Romney landslide. And now they’re telling voters they were stupid again. You can’t make this shyte up.
And now, O’Reilly is poised to become Hannity Jr, all the while claiming to be “independent” and not taking one side or the other. Perhaps “Father Bill” has been an act..
Proof the MSM are a bunch of straight shooters, Vol. MCLXVIII:
Not once in this story is the phrase “Big Brother” deployed. If the story had featured a candidate with an ‘R’ behind their name, the over/under on which Paragraph held the first (of many) references would be 1.5.
“Fun today watching NEW WH Correspondent Major Garrett being interviewed on CBS THIS MORNING by OLD WH Correspondent Norah O’Donnell.”
CBS really needs to launch a cable news network.
CBS should buy CURRENT and turn it into somewhere their excellent talent base could thrive.
“It was 4 year experiment to prove the voters were stupid once, and better smarten up now”
FAIL… stupid doubled down on stupid
“CBS should buy CURRENT and turn it into somewhere their excellent talent base could thrive.”
Not this time. Talk is that Gore and partner would like to unload CURRENT, and programming slots pre-ready on cable and satellite provides a ready platform.
This. It’s not the ideas, so much, it’s the Republicans.
“Work harder, you can only imagine how good Megyn Kelly looks in high def.”
I’ll just have to imagine it. I’m not ready to shell out $150 for a receiver.
“News Corporation has an agreement to acquire a 49 percent equity stake in the Yes Network, the New York Yankees’ regional cable sports channel.”
FNC did not broadcast Hillary Clinton’s comments from Israel live and stayed on the commercial break.
When they came back and went to the video Clinton and Netanyahu where walking away from the podiums.
They did not replay the comments went to the next guest.
Hey Joe, Danica Patrick and her husband are getting a divorce. Where does the line start?
Eh, no thanks..I’d rather have a Ferrari. I’ll take my “hot, expensive, and high maintenance” in a package that doesn’t yell at me. ;-)
“Eh, no thanks..I’d rather have a Ferrari. I’ll take my “hot, expensive, and high maintenance” in a package that doesn’t yell at me.”
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., has rewritten a bill that will be voted on next week, which would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ email, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant
That’s the second time in two weeks Beckel said something that the person on the delay button missed and I’m sure is going to be muted out of the rebroadcast.
They need to fire that idiot. There’s no place for joking about sexual assault. Ever.
Well, if it’s done in good taste…
Bob Beckel needs to wear a shirt that says “I apologize for the crude language”.
I need to wear a shirt that says “I was wrong. Bring back Glenn Beck”.
COUNTERPUNCH is one of my favorite newsletters of the Left. Dont spend all your time looking for affirmations from the internet or cable. You will never understand anything without listening to counter arguments that might challenge you.
The fact that progressives have issues with the President is not news. It’s been discussed here many times, and every night on Cenk Uygur’s show on Current.
so what, jerk
It’s been discussed here many times, and every night on Cenk Uygur’s show on Current.
If a discussion occurs on Current, does it make a sound?
Referencing Cenk’s (or anyone else’s) show on Current, is like referencing Beck’s show on The Blaze.
Who cares? Nobody watches it.
You’d get better supporting evidence from a fortune cookie.
Yeah, I think my point was rather obvious: Far-lefties dissatisfied with POTUS isn’t exactly a new phenomena. Reporting it like “Hey, did you know this?” in 2012 is kinda silly.
Far-lefties dissatisfied with POTUS isn’t exactly a new phenomena.
Rghties dissatisfied with Bush wasn’t exactly a unrare phenomenon either. Yet once Obama got into office and quadrupled the deficit, what was the first response from the Left? “How come you didn’t say anything when Bush was President?!? You must just be a racist!!!”
Don’t know why Joe has his head in the sand, The pressure from the Left is critical right now as Obama negotiates the fall off the fiscal cliff. They are extremely vocal in pushing tax increases for the rich and preventing cuts in entitlement or safety-net programs. If he gives, they will go berserk.