Pondering Jeff Zucker…

Variety’s Andrew Wallenstein pens a smart piece on Jeff Zucker. I disagree with parts of it but Wallenstein raises some interesting points nobody else has raised…

CNN needs what Zucker was able to do at NBC’s “Today” at an earlier stage in his career: to shake up established practices and find a new groove. Rare is the executive who has significant experience across both news and entertainment, along with a healthy respect for how digital is transforming both. Zucker fits that profile to a T.

The radical rethink of established practices Zucker has to undertake at CNN is not unlike what Disney called on Rich Ross to attempt at Walt Disney Studios, and we all know how that turned out. But the moral of that story isn’t that you don’t attempt change because it is too tough to pull off. The lesson is that it takes someone who’s already proven he knows how to attempt a bold turnaround to succeed when there’s such a high degree of difficulty.

Imagine the hooting and hollering that would occur if CNN dared to migrate the kind of unscripted programming it will be trying on weekends with Anthony Bourdain and Morgan Spurlock to time periods more accustomed to traditional news. It’s going to take someone like Zucker to make that happen.

And therein lies an interesting wrinkle in the Zucker comeback story: He’ll be knocking on the doors of the same talent agencies he alienated in the past in search of other talent to reignite CNN. But that won’t be a problem. He may make a lot of people in this town see red, but his money is still green.

If anything, his failures at NBCU are an asset in that Zucker has something to prove. He knows there are naysayers who want him to fail. And he probably craves an opportunity for redemption, something his current lower-profile gig as exec producer of Katie Couric’s syndie talkshow wasn’t going to deliver.


3 Responses to “Pondering Jeff Zucker…”

  1. CNN had a winner with Rick Sanchez’s “The List” The format was fast paced, and it effectively incorporated the internet chatter into the show.

    I don’t know what Zucker is supposed to bring to the table? Is he supposed to clone something he did for CBS for CNN? I wouldn’t describe that as innovative.

  2. Correction Katie Curic’s show is on ABC not CBS.

  3. I think CNN hiring Zucker is a universally bad idea. The argument made by Wallenstein is basically that Zucker will do well because he really, REALLY, wants to succeed. I am sure anyone who is hired would want to do a good job. That does not make a compelling argument. As for p!ssing off Hollywood – uh, who cares?! CNN certainly doesn’t. Does CNN seem like anything other than NYC-centric? That clearly won’t change. As for boldness, any dumb monkey can shake up an establishment like a snow globe but that doesn’t mean its a good thing. What matters is what happens when the dust settles – where do you go, what do you stand for, what is your mission, how to you serve your audience, who is your audience? I have zero confidence Zucker can be that guy. There is nothing new about him and nothing bold about his ideas.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: