(Mostly) Rubbish…

It’s already been shot down by MSNBC itself but I’m going to pile on. National Review Online’s Eliana Johnson has a silly little article about how Rachel Maddow is essentially part of the crew running things at NBC News.

Even if this article was even partially grounded in reality, which it isn’t, the idea that the story would break via NRO automatically raises multiple red flags. There are still enough media reporters out there (though not as many as there used to be) with connections deep enough to have broken this story well before it fell in Johnson’s lap.

Even more damning is the article itself which posits the idea that Maddow has mega input but fails to even offer one supporting piece of evidence to buttress the claim.

There are no anecdotes of Maddow orchestrating editorial control. There are no anecdotes of Maddow making personnel decisions. All there is are a few disconnected quotes that Johnson strung together to paint a picture of implied influence without any evidence of direct influence.

Then there’s Johnson’s “news” of some new script review processs that MSNBC has implemented as a result of the Bashir, Baldwin, and Melissa Harris-Perry incidents. First of all, Baldwin’s incident didn’t involve a script and didn’t occur on MSNBC’s air. MHP’s incident is too recent to have any influence on anything MSNBC may or may not have done. That just leaves us with Bashir’s. I have no doubt that emails flew after the Bashir incident and there may have been some remedial editorial instruction as a result. But one incident hardly a pattern makes.

MSNBC called this “…a story with more anonymous, uninformed sources than you’d ever find on the gossip pages”. That’s actually wrong. This is precisely the amount of uninformed sources you’d find in the gossip pages. But their veracity is just as questionable.

9 Responses to “(Mostly) Rubbish…”

  1. Why would anyone imagine Maddow had those kind of powers when clearly Olbermann didn’t?

  2. savefarris Says:

    ^ Chris Hayes continued employment.

    I’m inclined to believe this, but a little, you know, evidence, would be nice…

  3. Nixon - niila niihpikiiookwa meentwasiaani Says:

    We all know who is really running things behind the scenes at MSNBC. Satan.

  4. and his Kenyan sired disciple.

  5. savefarris Says:

    NR seems to have done Maddow a favor. Because otherwise, we’d be talking about this:

    http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2014/01/rachel-maddow-is-crazy-too.php

    In short, Rachel raked the Koch’s for donating to the same group that Comcast (i.e. Rachel’s employers) do.

  6. I have to agree Spud here. This ‘article’ sounds like something you would read at Daily Caller or News Busters not the revered National Review. I expect it will be picked up next as news by FNC hosts and be discussed as possible reality next week on Media Buzz.

    Ms. Johnson has a history with FNC as a writer on Hannity, as a producer and even occasionally an on air pundit, spouting the latest right wing talking points as facts.

    She’s also responsible for this short controversial article last year on NRO. Hope it works.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/339003/president-obama-commemorates-senseless-holocaust-eliana-johnson

  7. Nixon - niila niihpikiiookwa meentwasiaani Says:

    In short, Rachel raked the Koch’s for donating to the same group that Comcast (i.e. Rachel’s employers) do.

    The Koch brothers ought to buy Comcast. Then, we’ll see how well Rachel does at her new job at Mickey D’s.

  8. Chris Hayes continued employment

    That’s all Phil Griffin. He can’t just toss Hayes overboard because it would blow back right straight to him. So he has to gut this out for the time being.

  9. Farris: that’s long been my problem with Maddow; she’s just not a serious person. For someone portrayed as the smahtest person evah, she’s not interested in honest debate because facts, to her, are irrelevant. She’s a true believer. A lot of people on here rail against Hannity but Maddow is no better. And since she rarely allows opposing voices, she’s worse.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: