Free for All: 05/20/15

What’s on your mind?


9 Responses to “Free for All: 05/20/15”

  1. “The emails aren’t mine. They belong to the State Dept.”
    Ummm…just in case you forgot Hilary, you had a server in your home with your emails on it. And oh yeah, did you forget that you vetted the emails yourself that you sent to the State Dept? So…the State Dept. will decide what emails, OF THE ONES YOU DECIDED TO GIVE THEM, will be released. And they should hurry up and do that because, I know, there will be “nothing to see here, move on, move on.”

    But, according the Iowa Dems she’s tough, has been in public life for a long time, isn’t really trustworthy, and we can’t point to anything great she has actually accomplished but she should be our President because….”

    You gotta watch the focus groups Halperin did in Iowa to get the gist of what Dems are all about.

  2. savefarris Says:

    “The emails aren’t mine. They belong to the State Dept.”

    Technically, they belong to *US* as work product of a government official belongs to the public.

    State is merely in possession of said documents at the moment.

  3. Just learned that according to a March piece in the National Review, “Marco Rubio has made it clear that if he runs for president, he won’t also run for reelection to the Senate.”


    I knew about Rand Paul, but I was not aware that Rubio may also vacate his Senate seat.

    Seems awfully risky. Although unlike Sen. Paul and Sen. Cruz (who apparently will keep his Senate seat), I suspect Rubio also has a shot at a VP nomination.

  4. savefarris Says:

    Rubio has until 5/6/2016 to declare for the Senate race. If he gets knocked out early, it’s conceivable he comes back and runs.

    Rand would have to register by 1/26, so his “Drop Out and Re-enter window” is almost non-existant. And somehow, I don’t think Allison Lundergan Grimes is gonna give him the benefit of the doubt.

  5. savefarris Says:

    As for the “Fox News Viewers might be dummies” study brought up a couple of days ago …

    This is why it’s hard to take any of those at face value:

  6. savefarris Says:

    Let us all thank our lucky stars the WaPo is around and investigating when no one else dares too. Thanks to them, we’ve now uncovered who was REALLY responsible for the Waco Shootout:

    How is that woman even allowed on the streets?!?!?

  7. savefarris Says:

    The Clinton Foundation ensnares another newscaster:

    In the article, something I didn’t know about The Tapp: he worked for Chelsea’s mother-in-law.

    One big incestuous family.

  8. savefarris Says:

    Any guess as to which side the NYT is taking on Release 1.0 of the Clinton emails?

    The Times obtained about a third of the 850 pages of emails. They appear to back up Mrs. Clinton’s previous assertions that she did not receive classified information at her private email address.

    So, out of the 1/3rd that your source allowed you to see of the 1/30th that State is releasing of the 1/2 that Hillary sent to state (Apx. 0.5% of total), you can definitively state that Hillary is in the clear?!?

  9. savefarris Says:

    Chris Matthews buys into the “Hillary is secretly using a walker” conspiracy:

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: