Pondering MSNBC’s Future…

The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple writes about today’s MSNBC news.

Will some tinkering with the daytime lineup solve MSNBC’s problems? Impossible. No one in media critic circles will fault a news network for moving toward more news, but there is the small issue of CNN. Have a look at the chart below, laying out the newsgathering investment of the three major cable news networks, as measured by the research outfit SNL Kagan and reported in the Pew Research Center’s “State of the News Media 2014.”

As of 2013, the chart indicates, CNN was outspending MSNBC by $500 million on news expenditures. Switching around the orientation of some programs won’t make a dent in that disparity. Some press releases, some new faces and a brand-new mission won’t enable MSNBC to puncture CNN’s go-to-ness when it comes to breaking news. In fairness to the plan, however, Lack envisions an ever-closer partnership between NBC News and MSNBC as the latter shifts away from lefty fare and toward news reporting. That alone will beef up MSNBC’s straight-news plan.

I am not convinced. NBCU 2.0 did a lot of damage to MSNBC and its ability to mount a credible straight newscast that didn’t consist of mostly a few choice headlines and a few reports from news bureaus. The days of live hits from NBC’s affiliate service are long gone. I think it will take more than just integrating MSNBC and NBC tighter together. It will take investment. I’m not sure NBC is prepared to make that investment.

8 Responses to “Pondering MSNBC’s Future…”

  1. bonnieux Says:

    The news came out today that three shows cancelled.

    Ed Schultz, Alex Wagner and The Cycle.

    Hope this is only a rumor.

  2. It’s not.

  3. Bonnie, your bias is showing. Those were all horrible programs and it was a matter of time before they got squashed. Maybe Alex can go work for Gawker. I hear they are hiring.

  4. How is her bias showing? Her bias that she liked those shows? Well…ok but if you use that as a measuring stick then I could also say you’re displaying your bias about disliking those shows.

  5. When you have on average 25000 viewers in the demo, as does The Cycle, the bias shows that she is one of very few people in ALL of the USA who thinks that is a good show. When you are 1 out of that few it shows how strongly you believe in that viewpoint. Bias defined.

  6. Oh, andI have no problem with saying I am biased against the garbage that MSNBC puts out. And, I believe that based on viewership many other members of TV watchers show their “bias” also.

  7. Ratings does not always equal quality. There’s plenty of crap on cable news that rates high.

  8. The worst crap on cable news rates highest.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: