Bret Baier Profile…

NPR’s David Folkenflik profiles FNC’s Bret Baier…

I reviewed six months worth of Baier’s panels, and same mix typically prevailed: two clear-cut conservatives and one other analyst. That other person was sometimes a Democrat or liberal, say, former Democratic strategist Kirsten Powers. But usually it was a journalist from a nonideological news outlet, such as the Hill, Politico, the Washington Post or NPR. (Mara Liasson is a news analyst for Fox.)

As I told Baier, that would seem both to under-represent the left and also to cast reporters as though they’re surrogate liberals.

“I understand your point,” Baier said. “I think numerous people can make the case what the administration is trying to do (or) trying to say. That provides a perspective. Not advocating for that position but analyzing it.”

Baier and his boss, Clemente, also say they open to tinkering with the format of the panels.

McIntyre, the former CNN reporter, says Baier has prospered in his two years as an anchor.

“He’s cracked the code,” McIntyre says. “He’s figured out what it is he needs to do with the employer he works for, and I think he’s also trying to uphold his personal standards. And I think he does that pretty well.”

10 Responses to “Bret Baier Profile…”

  1. joeremi Says:

    A panel heavily weighted conservative on a conservative network is not a big deal. The rest of Special Report is very good; Bret Baier is very good. A few more hours of this stuff on FNC Dayside would do them a world of good.

  2. I wish he could have Kirsten Powers on the show more often, but she’s usually in NYC. She more or less qualifies as the type of “working journalist” they look for on that show, and she’s able to do so from a reasoned liberal perspective.

  3. Josh Kalb Says:

    Juan Williams could be on the show more, too. A panel of Stephen Hayes, Juan Williams, Kirsten Powers, and Charles Krauthammer would be a good.

    You could substitute in Mara Liasson, A.B. Stoddard, or some of the other panelists when Kirsten or Juan are unavailable. When Hayes or Krauthammer isn’t there, Tucker Carlson, Fred Barnes, Jonah Goldberg, and Bill Crystal are the best subs.

    Sometimes the “second tier” people are actually better, just because you get bored from hearing the same people talk night after night.

  4. I also miss seeing Mort Kondracke. Didn’t matter if I agreed with his opinions or not because he was always very clued-in on various Washington back stories.

  5. missy5537 Says:

    The irony is KILLING ME! NPR, a public funded lib organization, is wondering where the libs are at Fox? What about the lack of conservatives at HIS outfit?!

    Can’t make this stuff up!!!!!

  6. joeremi Says:

    I hate to do this, but, Missy’s right..that’s pretty funny.

  7. harry1420 Says:

    fox fair and completely unbalanced..now thats the truth

  8. I don’t listen to NPR much, but doesn’t NPR (and a lot of people who support them) tout how many conservatives they have on their programming. I think even Juan Williams has reiterated that point.

  9. joeremi Says:

    I can take or leave the minuscule amount of federal funding NPR receives, but it’s excellent programming. IMO it leans left enough to warrant Missy’s hysterical comment, but no more so than Special Report leans right. Some slightly-tilted news is good.,complete objectivity is overrated. It’s the egregious talking-point crap Megyn traffics in that gets on my nerves. That moves from slight-bias news, to campaign-style advertising.

  10. NPR has very good programming and I’m a regular donor. I don’t mind their unbalanced slant but wish they would simply own up to what they are. And calling it “liberal” isn’t quite accurate enough… I recognise the “university”-style thinking from my work and it’s…. more “elite” than “liberal”.

    There is no good reason to continue funding NPR & PBS with tax dollars and most of their stations will do fine without it. They should keep their tax deductible status, however.

Leave a comment