Riding the Whirlwind…

In a must read, Gabriel Sherman writes in New York Magazine about Roger Ailes and FNC. As with the last opus on cable news Sherman wrote, there’s no way I can pick one section to highlight. There are just too damn many. Like this one…

Beck had been hired to solve a problem that had vexed Ailes for years: The five-o’clock hour continually failed to attract an audience, which delivered a weak lead-in to the shows that followed. Fox executives dubbed the slot the “black hole.” Ailes had unsuccessfully cycled through a slew of anchors, from John Gibson to Laura ­Ingraham. Ingraham’s turn was especially rocky. She would scream so loudly at her staff off-camera that producers in the newsroom would turn on the monitors for fun and watch the unfolding drama.

And this…

But as Fox was helping to inflate the tea party’s balloon, some of the network’s journalistic ballast was disappearing. Starting in July 2008, a series of high-level departures began when Brit Hume, Ailes’s longtime Washington anchor, announced his retirement inside Fox. Then, three weeks after the election, David Rhodes, Fox’s vice-­president for news, quit to work for Bloomberg. Rhodes had started at Fox as a 22-year-old production assistant and risen through the ranks to become No. 2 in charge of news. His brother was a senior foreign-policy aide to Obama, and Rhodes told staffers that Ailes had expressed concern about this closeness to the White House. Rhodes privately told people he was uncomfortable with where Fox was going in the Obama era.

And this…

Meanwhile, Hume’s replacement, Bill Sammon, a former Washington Times correspondent, angered Fox’s political reporters, who saw him pushing coverage further to the right than they were comfortable with. Days after Obama’s inauguration, an ice storm caused major damage throughout the Midwest. At an editorial meeting in the D.C. bureau, Sammon told producers that Fox should compare Obama’s response to Bush’s handling of Katrina. “Bush got grief for Katrina,” Sammon said.

“It’s too early; give him some time to respond,” a producer shot back. “This ice storm isn’t Katrina.”

And this…

Going back to the 2008 campaign, Axelrod had maintained an off-the-­record dialogue with Ailes. He had faced off against Ailes in a U.S. Senate campaign in the early eighties and respected him as a fellow political warrior and shaper of narrative. But early on, Axelrod learned he couldn’t change Ailes’s outlook on Obama. In one meeting in 2008, Ailes told Axelrod that he was concerned that Obama wanted to create a national police force.

“You can’t be serious,” Axelrod replied. “What makes you think that?”

Ailes responded by e-mailing Axelrod a YouTube clip from a campaign speech Obama had given on national service, in which he called for the creation of a new civilian corps to work alongside the military on projects overseas.

Later, Axelrod related in a conversation that the exchange was the moment he realized Ailes truly believed what he was broadcasting.

And this…

Last year, tensions between Palin’s camp and Fox erupted over a prime-time special that the network wanted her to host. Nancy Duffy, a senior Fox producer, wanted Palin to host the show in front of a live studio audience. Duffy wanted to call the program Sarah Palin’s Real American Stories. Palin hated the idea. She complained to her advisers that she didn’t want to be a talk-show host. She wanted to just do voice-overs. More important, she didn’t want Fox to promote her name in the title of the program. Not that it mattered: Palin’s ratings were starting to disappoint Ailes anyway. Fox hasn’t scheduled any additional specials.

Ailes began to doubt Palin’s political instincts. He thought she was getting bad advice from her kitchen cabinet and saw her erratic behavior as a sign that she is a “loose cannon,” as one person close to him put it. A turning point in their relationship came during the apex of the media debate over the Tucson shooting. As the media pounced on Palin’s rhetoric, Palin wanted to fight back. She felt it was deeply unfair that commentators were singling her out. Ailes agreed but told her to stay out of it. He thought if she stayed quiet, she would score a victory.

“Lie low,” he told her. “If you want to respond later, fine, but do not interfere with the memorial service.”

Palin ignored Ailes’s advice and went ahead and released her now-infamous “blood libel” video the morning Obama traveled to Tucson. For Ailes, the move was further evidence that Palin was flailing around off-message. “Why did you call me for advice?” he wondered out loud to colleagues.

27 Responses to “Riding the Whirlwind…”

  1. laura l Says:

    — “Bush got grief for Katrina,” Sammon said. —

    Is this guy gone yet? I expect that crap from idiots like me and Hannity, but not from someone who pretends to do straight news.

  2. Josh Kaib Says:

    To be fair to Ingraham, she only had the slot for a week or two and it was clearly just a short-term thing. Gibson, on the other hand, had the slot for a while.

    His show did okay compared to other FNC shows, but was handicapped by its reliance on tabloid crap. If it was more focused on political stories it would have done better. Adding Heather Nauert to the show made it worse.

    I think FNC should expand Special Report to two hours, at least through the next inauguration. Then it can find a permanent replacement. Either Megyn Kelly gets promoted to a better timeslot, Judge Napolitano moves from FBN, or Bret Baier gets the slot. I don’t see any other option that would work.

    I expect that once FBN gets greater carriage and ratings, Neil Cavuto will leave his FNC show and focus solely on FBN. That probably won’t be until 2013. At that point I could see Kelly getting the slot from 4-6 eastern.

    I don’t think management would want to put Judge Nap in the 5 pm slot. He will be just as controversial as Beck. That’s why Bret Baier, at least in the short term, is a no-brainer for the slot. It would compete nicely against The Situation Room. They just need to find a “grumpy but wise old man” to fill the Jack Cafferty role. Brit Hume could do that with two commentaries per night instead of one.

  3. harry1420 Says:

    fox has one goal and one goal only…to continually dawg obama and the democrats. fox would not survive without its political crap!

  4. Josh Kaib Says:

    MSNBC, meanwhile, has its own political crap yet it is barely surviving and wouldn’t without NBC News’ network news (like the Today show cash cow) and endless lockup reruns on the weekends.

    Pick your poison: The FNC “political crap” or the MSNBC “everything crap.”

  5. “I expect that once FBN gets greater carriage and ratings”

    ^You might want to consider replacing the “once” with a ‘when/if’ in that comment; with the emphasis on the ‘if’. 😉

  6. joeremi Says:

    A national police force? And we wonder why Fox News traffics in so many paranoid conspiracy theorys. It’s a travesty that Rupert put that political hack in charge of “news”.

  7. joeremi Says:

    ‘theories’. Ugh.

  8. missy5537 Says:

    I don’t feel like reading this, which I’m guessing is a hit piece. But could someone please tell me what the author purports to be the “REAL” reason Beck’s leaving the 5 p.m. hr.?

  9. Josh Kaib Says:

    I find the “national police force” crap hard to believe. Ailes is conservative, not paranoid.

  10. Missy: It’s not a “hit piece” it’s journalism; something Fox viewers rarely see or, I guess in your case, read.

    The reason Beck left was because both he and Ailes had reached the point where Beck wasn’t helping advance the FNC agenda and FOX wasn’t helping advance Beck’s career in a way that he wanted. There was no ‘Real’ reason; just a mutual parting of the ways based on a number of mitigating factors.

    It’s a really good ‘ fair and balanced’ article on the inner workings at FNC and well worth a read. You should reconsider your passing on it.

  11. joeremi Says:

    Some Fox viewers are quite happy with the paranoid crap they replace news with, and have no interest in learning how it’s done.

  12. joeremi Says:

    Josh, if you think Roger Ailes isn’t paranoid, you haven’t been paying attention. In order for your “disbelief” to hold up, Axelrod or the author would have to have made up the story. I find THAT hard to believe.

  13. You find it hard to believe that David Axelrod would make up a story? I have no way of knowing if what’s in this article is made up or not, but it’s plain naive to think Axelrod is above such things.

  14. joeremi Says:

    No Al, I don’t think Axelrod would make up a story like that. The odds are so much higher that Ailes said it than Axelrod lied that even debating it is laughable.

  15. joeremi Says:

    So let’s see, the score is: One who doesn’t believe the story; another who makes no comment on the story, but casts doubts on the same quote; one who refuse to even read it; and one who responds with some weird Gawker thing. That’s four conservatives deflecting and denying, with only one (Laura) willing to take the article at face value, and criticize the network she always watches. Nice.

  16. lonestar77 Says:

    “Some Fox viewers are quite happy with the paranoid crap they replace news with, and have no interest in learning how it’s done.”

    Well, most who watch FNC watch because we’ve grown tired of the paranoid crap that the other outlets replace news with.

  17. laura l Says:

    I took one statement at face-value, having not yet read the rest of the article. I certainly do not have such naive faith in David Axelrod. I also don’t believe that that would make the entire story wrong, in any case.

  18. lonestar77 Says:

    I wouldn’t believe Axelrod if he told me water was wet; but, I’ve never like him. He’s a hack.

  19. joeremi Says:

    Well, most who watch FNC watch because we’ve grown tired of the paranoid crap that the other outlets replace news with.

    Then there’s people like me who watch because many of their opinion shows are entertaining in a “I can’t believe they say that shyte” kinda way, and try to ignore the agenda-driven crap on dayside. Also, Red Eye. Always Red Eye.

  20. laura l Says:

    — And it didn’t help matters that O’Reilly, who had become friends with Beck and can’t stand Hannity, scheduled Beck as a regular guest, a move that only annoyed Hannity further. —

    Haven’t gotten all through it yet, but I love this. Good to know that Billo is exercising his pique in useful ways..

  21. joeremi Says:

    ^ I love it. That’s reason enough for me to watch Billo more often.

  22. LOL @ Missy thinking the article is a “hit piece”. Not only is it a great article, but there was so much quoting of Fox News management and executives, that it could have practically been written by Fox News, just without the far-right conservative slant.

    It’s basically an inside look on what happens at Fox News… I would love to see that for MSNBC (as a viewer of MSNBC), as well. I read a piece about the network, and dealing with Olbermann from 2008, I believe. It was very insightful.

  23. That article was also from New York Magazine, by the way… they do a great job with actual journalism.

  24. The big take away for me, from the article, is that Aile’s wants to take Fox to a more mainstream Republican POV, as opposed to the Tea party craziness of the last two years. It will be interesting to see how that storyline plays out over the next year or so in who gets hired as a host, pundit or analysis and particularly what stories get covered. Do we see a moving away from the NBPP and Acorn stories and more into mainstream healthcare/economic storylines.

  25. […] The blowback to Gabriel Sherman’s Roger Ailes/FNC opus from over the weekend has commenced. It seems to be immediately centered around what Roger Ailes […]

  26. Tamil Serials online,Telugu Serials online,Hindi Serials online,Malayalam Serials online…

    […]Riding the Whirlwind… « Inside Cable News[…]…

Leave a comment