Fox and Friends: Following in Hardball’s Footsteps?

The Atlantic Wire’s John Hudson writes that Fox and Friends wasn’t the first cable news show this year to produce a slick collection of bits aimed against a presidential candidate…

The crux of media complaints was that airing GOP ads is one thing but for a news network to produce and broadcast its own partisan pieces dangerously shifts its role from “journalism to advocacy,” as Mediaite’s Noah Rothman put it. By the same standard, however, one would have to argue that MSNBC is guilty of the same crime.

In late February, the left-leaning network aired a slickly-produced hit piece on Mitt Romney titled “Mitt: Better Off Mute” that aired on the nightly cable show Hardball with Chris Matthews and Sunday morning talk show The Chris Matthews Show, which typically airs on NBC affiliates and their sister stations. The video lampoons Romney’s habit of gaffing whenever he opens his mouth, and plays off the theme of the Oscar-winning film The Artist in which a silent film star struggles to adapt to films with sound.

The video latches onto the idea that, by appearance, Romney looks presidential and competent but is actually a buffoonish dunce. “Much like the perfect silent picture star whose career was thwarted by the emergence of sound in cinema, Mitt Romney has stumbled when he’s had to open his mouth,” reads the film’s YouTube description. Some might argue that the video is shorter in length (it’s a little over one-minute) and far less savage with its subject, but then we’re getting into gradations, which is a factor in all political advertising. For instance, the way the segment humorously displays the build-up of political hype surrounding Romney only to show him fail, resembles the satirical “Obama is cool” ads produced by GOP operative Karl Rove.

13 Responses to “Fox and Friends: Following in Hardball’s Footsteps?”

  1. Snortski. Let the “Yes, but”s begin.

  2. Yes, but “they knew Fox was going to do it so they just did it first”.

  3. missy5537 Says:

    But I guess that was OK, since it took four months for anyone to point it out.

  4. I seem to recall it was pointed out…just not criticized like the FnF piece…

  5. Isn’t that special.

  6. savefarris Says:

    C’mon Jon Stewart.
    C’mon Mediaite.
    C’mon Ed.
    C’mon Rachel.

    Have some intellectual honesty and slam MSNBC using the exact same tone and outrage that you did FOX.

    … or else reveal yourselves as the hypocrites you are.

  7. There is a difference. MSNBC is a POV network that claims to be a left-leaning POV network. FOX “News” Channel claims to be a news channel and FOX & Friends claims to be a news program. I have a lot of friends who think F&F is a news show and I’ve always replied that it’s nothing more than a right wing snarkfest. This just proves it.

  8. savefarris Says:

    “We are not a political operation, Fox is. We are a news operation and the rules around here are part of how you know that” — Rachel Maddow 11/7/2010

  9. lonestar77 Says:

    If F&F considers themselves a news show, then I guess that’s on them. I don’t consider them or the Today Show, GMA, etc. news show. I consider all of them entertainment shows.

    Where you been, Andy? Thought about you when the Jags drafted a punter in the 3rd round but the more I thought about it, the more I liked it

  10. Fox News deserves the criticisms over this incident. That (MS)NBC was not equally criticised for its transgression is irrelevant.

  11. It’s annoying as hell that Fox and MSNBC keep getting dinged for this sh|t, and who’s Number Three?

  12. These types of humerous slams against conservatives on MSNBC go all the way back to Countdown. Rachel does them all the time. They’re opinion shows openly opposing Mitt Romney for President. F&F plays as a news show no matter how many times they pretend it’s entertainment. Even Morning Joe – which has extended opinion chats – wouldn’t get away with a clip like that in the morning.

  13. Al is right. Comparison stuff floods blog comments routinely. “Well, Bush did it.” “John Kerry was richer and nobody…”. It’s really more of changing the subject than making an argument. I confess I do it too much. Always tempting.

Leave a comment