Bad Vetting by CNN’s iReport?

Five days ago CNN’s iReport posted an “Editor’s pick!” video concerning Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation and the thorny subject of fracking in Dimock Pennsylvania. The video was submitted by a board member of the Gas Drilling Awareness Coalition, Inc, a group with a distinct point of view on the subject of fracking. The video featured an interview with a person who’s suing Cabot over alleged groundwater contamination. Well, as one would imagine, the “other side” in this contentious issue was none too happy that this video got posted without contextual explanation or journalistic examination of the “facts” in the case. The Northeast Marcellus Initiative submitted an article to blasting CNN for not vetting the video.

CNN failed miserably here in presenting unbiased information about the situation in Dimock. Did it do so on purpose? The only one who can answer that is CNN. What we know is that CNN made a clarification to this post, and its veracity, and then removed it after we informed them of these, and similar, concerns. We also know the producer has endorsed other Scott Cannon “documentaries”. Finally, the final thirty seconds is nothing more than an advertisement for GDAC.

Two days ago, George E. Start, Director of External Affairs at Cabot sent a letter to CNN protesting the posting of this video without proper examination of its claims.

Because Mr. Cannon chose not to check his facts and because CNN chose to air the report, serious false allegations have been lodged against Cabot in a video viewed approximately 50,000 times. Before the reputation of our company is smeared even further, I request that you remove this video from your website.

In issues as contentious as this where there’s a lot of he said/she said facts being thrown around, it’s imperative for news organizations to, at a minimum, state that the facts of such a video are in dispute. So far, CNN has not done so. There is a “CNN Producer Note” on the video page which states the following…

iReporter ScottCannon, a board member of the Gas Drilling Awareness Coalition, Inc., shot this video in Dimock, Pennsylvania, a town at the heart of an EPA water drilling investigation. The video includes an interview with Susan Roos, a resident of Dimock who claims her water supply has been contaminated by gas extraction practices. This video package also includes an interview with EPA spokesperson Trish Taylor, who is part of a team investigating claims in the area.

You can read more about the ‘fracking’ situation in Dimock in an earlier piece on – elchueco, CNN iReport producer

Nowhere in this note does it state that the claims in this video are contested, nor does it state the agenda of the Gas Drilling Awareness Coalition or examine the claims made in this video. There is a glaring lack of disclosure and context regarding this video.

I don’t have enough information to form an reality based opinion on the subject of fracking and I really don’t care as far as this blog is concerned. I am concerned that CNN appears to have cut some corners it shouldn’t have cut when tackling an iReport submission concerning an issue as contentious as this one is. CNN owes an explanation for why this video was posted, apparently factually un-verified, and why it continues to remain live without putting the video in the necessary context of this being one side in a hard fought PR war over an issue where the science is apparently not completely known yet.


11 Responses to “Bad Vetting by CNN’s iReport?”

  1. Those who have developed a vacinations-cause-autism mindset to extraction of nature gas from hydraulic fracturing doe much care for facts. Frack.

  2. It’s potentially a critically important subject and this sort of journalistic malpractice does the public a great disservice. One-sided reporting carries the risk of making future reports on the subject from any source less believable. Someone should be fired for this and then CNN should follow up with a full and fair reporting.

  3. Pathetic – do journalists even know how do to journalism anymore? No wonder people have such animosity towards the press – of all stripes!

  4. I wouldn’t be surprised if CNN has parroted claims made by the dishonest Josh Fox about fracking. Oh wait, they have.

  5. I’ve had a fracked well about 300 yards from my cabin for 5 years now. Caused no problems whatsoever that I can tell other then I occasionally belch flames.

  6. There has been a number of bogus claims critical to fracking making the rounds and my fear is that these will mask any legitimate findings that give reasons for concern. Up until very recently, companies have kept the chemicals they use in the process as closely-held trade secrets and it can be very difficult to identify contamination of the water tables if you don’t know what you’re looking for.

    If the process is safe as I expect it is then its industry should have no problem whatsoever with allowing full and unfettered access for legitimate scientific study. Just as we’ve seen with the global warming bs, whenever the news media takes sides, intentionally or not, society’s trust is severely compromised in both the media and the scientific process, and eventually in government itself.

  7. Isn’t this the inherent problem to CNN’s whole I-Reporting project? Feedback from viewers is great but you can’t just outsource quality journalism from any crank with an idea and handheld camera.

  8. savefarris Says:

    Can we please come up with another word for this procedure? I keep having Battlestar Galactica flashbacks.

    No surprise that CNN has no standards, at least when it comes to protecting the liberal side. In other news, water is wet.

  9. Even with strong editing, newspapers like the NYT, Baltimore Sun, and magazines like the New Republic get duped by false stories from the Jason Blairs and Steven Glasses of the world. Take whatever comes your way with barely a glance, and Katie bar the door., the end of journalism.

  10. I need an editor.

  11. […] Cannon, the man behind that CNN iReport on fracking in Pennsylvania which ICN blogged about last weekend, posted a comment on Facebook regarding the controversy, apparently after reading this blog… […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: